Hot-Button Issue Paper Essay

Nowadays one of most concerning topic in todays media is call down and fury. Determining whats too much for nipperren is not an flaccid task, beca use either p arnt has their in-person preferences slightly much(prenominal)(prenominal) matters. But ascertain the actual effects of media military force on children gives rise a enigma in itself, as its quite tricky to actually confine what violent media means to the children (Cutler, 2002). There were many children friendly understands back in the days, shows that taught whatsoever useful lessons to the children in a non-violent manner. Shows like set backtales or Darkwing Duck are examples of such shows that children not simply could enjoy, besides besides unwrap some(prenominal) valu able-bodied lessons from. Even vintold come on video games like tops(p) Mario was beneficial a fun seeking game that children could enjoy and parents didnt devour to worry about their effects on their children too. But if we fount at the TV shows, paintings and games in the present, its quite obvious that the use of redundantive force out has crawled its way into almost every form of media. some other problem is the increase of usage of switch onual acts in the media. There are open discussions of sex and enactments of internal activities in almost all the TV shows and movies. In the past, TV shows mostly showed two persons getting into bed and the attached scene took us to the next day.There were no enactments of internal activities in the shows. But today, almost every show on every bountifulness channels show fully nude persons or even the acts of having sex. The media industries have been strongly resisting such arguments that the usage of scenes get hold ofing sex, power, and drug usage in TV, music, radio receiver and movies is directly related to the increasing cases of negative behavior buildups in the company, (Anderson, 2002). Canceling such shows is the only way to get rid of sex from the TV. But doing so creates the possibility that children will induce up without the knowledge of sex. They exponent grow up and have to face the big bad world without anyone to right guide them into making the right decisions. So its essential for them to check the correct decisions at an early age, sothat they dont lead any decision that could destroy their life forever. You might be able to train the TV shows on their usage of sex and violence but what about other forms of media such as magazines, internet, books, music, and movies? Nowadays media has an array of methods to seduce peoples eyes. They tin target audiences of any age or group by tempting their senses. Teenagers are frequently attracted by violent acts, and by apply this they can easily influence them. It doesnt matter if its TV or the movies or the internet, violence is everywhere and trying to shut raft all of them is simply not possible.Imagine yourself in a scenario where youre changing through channe ls on the TV and you cant find any shows with violence, shooting or versed scenes. What would you do in that case, keep on being the TV or turn it eat up and do something else? Doing the later would cause the viewer ratings of TV networks to go raft and thus endowment them the impression that they need to show more violence and sexual acts to attract the audiences. Theres no point in denying that sex and violence attract people or sell, so to say. Although almost 60-70 persons out of 100 say that thithers excess use of sex and violence on TV, they have to firstly go out such usage to find that out. Imagine a show that you watch on a regular basis, and youd realize by yourself that sex and violence sell. Not a single person can be found who hasnt seen or doesnt know of a show that uses violence or sexual references, at the very least. Just as a children might want to smoke if they see their parents smoke, they as well might have the inclination towards committing crime if they see their favorite TV font commit a crime. Recently several methods have been developed to control or even hold specific shows at specific times. A parental control, that gives the parents the power to block certain TV shows, is offered by every cable provider. But still, its the parent that must decide whether to block or not.The V-chip is a recent controlling method developed to spring sex and violence scenes from being showed on the TV and its through with(p) by incorporating a small chip in the TV. But to some extent, this seems to be violating the first amendment. What someone wants to watch on their TV is their personal choice why should they be restrained from watching something they want? Its understandable that children shouldnt be exposed to such shows that negatively electrical shock their sense of judgment, but what about someone whos an adult and ordain to watch those shows? Whether you deliver play inshows containing sex and violence in your household premises is a decision that you should make, not the government. If there are children in the house, the parents should be responsible for keeping them away from shows that contain sex or violence. Another point is that most of these shows are visionary at nighttime, and its safe to assume that children should be in the bed by that time. If kids are staying up at nights to see such shows, its not the networks fault that they are airing these shows, but its the parents fault that they cant fulfill their responsibilities as a parent. On average, a child in the ground forces watches almost 28 hours of TV shows per week. Also, by the age of eleven, before finishing elementary school, a child views about 8000 murders on these TV shows. And the most terrifying fact is that in almost 75% of the cases shown in the TV, the criminal is shown to get away without being caught and retrieveing no remorse for their violent acts.This creates a false impression on children about violence. They often get an impractical idea about the acts of violence. Some of them feel no call for of violence whatsoever and even pretend that its cool, while other few become scared of everything around them. In 2009, the National establishment of Women reported that the most violent shows that were being aired were- Alias of ABC, Law & Order SVU of NBC and WWE Smackdown of CW (NOW, 2009). When children watch TV shows that show someone committing a crime and getting away with it, it creates an impression on their legal opinion that even they can get away without suffering the consequences of their actions. Its also possible to link violent movies to several cases of assault, robbery and other anti kindly behaviors. People, particularly teenagers, often confuse things they watch on TV or movies with reality. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, the Columbine shooters, are a perfect example of such delusional cases. They tried to duplicate scenes from the movies The Matrix and Basketball Diaries and even appareled up in trench coats and armed themselves with guns to depict those scenes. But just watching violence on TV and movies is not the entire story, there are several other factors that shape the thoughts of persons.Information obtained from several social research studies prove that what a child learns from what he/she watches is greatly bear upon by his/her surrounding environment (Anderson, 2002). For instance, if a child grows up sightedness domestic violence in his/her household, he/she is more likely to think that these acts of violence is acceptable in the society. He/she wouldbe more inclined(predicate) to act according to what he/she saw when growing up, thus giving him/her a completely false sense of whats acceptable and whats not. To those who are mentally handicapped, these effects are much more severe. Since they often have problems differentiating whats right and whats wrong, exposure to these sexual acts and violence diverseness the way they think about the w orld and often clouds their judgments. ceremonial occasion people commit crimes in the media might give them the impression that its okay to do such acts. In one of her studies, Sue Bailey declare that people would often enact scenes they saw in the media, even if those scenes were to contain violence or sexual exploitation (Anderson, 2002). This is in fact the master(prenominal) reason why we see so many copycat criminals nowadays. This reminds us of the Banduras theory of modeling (Sparks, 2013). Children often idolize these TV and movie characters and watching their idols beat someone, sell drugs, and committing crimes makes them want to do the same.The act of violence and their rate varies in every society, but whats alarming is that the USA has a horrifying rate of killings and suicides in the 15 year age group. In 1995, the combined death toll of children among 26 countries was at 2872. break of these 2872 deaths, 1446 were in the USA alone and compared with the other 25 c ountries this rate was almost 5 times higher. A childs personality also plays an important role in their vulnerability to these violent acts. From an early age, some children might have the tendency to be temperamental. Watching violent acts in the media might increase their tendency to act violently. Furthermore, prolonged exposure to acts of violence increases their chance to act according to what they see in the media. Showing sexual acts and violence in TV can, in many ways, negatively trespass the society. But the most argued point is the belief that a persons behavior is touch by what they watch.But this seems likely only if someone was to watch only these type of shows at all times. Watching such acts on TV or movies once or twice is not going to affect someones personality or turn them into violent sexual offenders. Moreover, the choices someone make is their and theirs only to make. No one else can be blamed for their personal faults. To conclude all this discussion, toda ys TV cant be compared with the TV from 30 years ago. at presents shows cover a more wide range of topics, personify different cultures and languages and theyre targeted for every age group. The increase in sexual scenes and actsof violence in the media reflects the change our society has undergone in the past years. This change cant be denied and sooner or later society has to accept that these shows are a part of this change. So rather than demanding to backtrack this change, its practical to demand that these shows should be aired at a certain time, thus enabling the viewers to choose what they see and what they allow their children to see.ReferencesAnderson, C. A. (2002). Violent Video Games and Hostile Expectations. Retrieved from http//www.psychology.iastate.edu/faculty/caa/abstracts/2000-2004/02BApspb.pdf Bandura, A. (2006). Social Learning Theory. Retrieved from http//www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/social-learning.html Cutler, Maggie investigate on the Effects of M edia Violence on Children Is Inconclusive. Is Media Violence a Problem? James D. Torr, Ed. At Issue Series. Greenhaven Press 2002 National Organization of Women. (2009). Retrieved from http//www.now.org/organization/conference/resolutions/2009.html Sparks, G. G. (2013). Media Effects Research (14th ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook.