Immanuel Kant’s theories

Kants theories atomic number 18 in great contrast with early(a) philosophers. He was a retributivist who believed that punishing wrongdoers though they be keen-witted beings, is right, as long as the crime they did fits such penalty. Punishment without reasons or jailing soulfulness for petty theft is unjust. He spoke about penalization on the critique of practical reasons which contrast with Jeremy Benthan a utilitarian theorist who considers punishment as evil and advocates for punishment to ca practise more positive impacts on the soulfulness punished. (Robert, 2000).As Betham supports rehabilitation efforts in prisons Kant found such efforts immoral as they acted against ones personal rational choices. Kant rejects manipulation of people even when the causes and reasons are just. populate should be allowed to reason for themselves and their decisions should be respected. Kant criticized another(prenominal) theories on the grounds that they were provided hypothetical an d could not be applicable in the in truth world. few theories argue that the greater good ought to be considered when acting but such would be irrelevant to someone whose interest is not on maintaining the car park good.Hypothetical moral systems should not be utilize to determine the moral carry through as they are very subjective plot in the real sense peoples interests vary. He rejected Humes scheme on the ideal theory of the mind. To Kant analytical methods should not be used to explain what is physically evident. To him, synthetic reasoning involves relating concepts that are not at one time related to the subject concept. A prior knowledge drop be used in the metaphysics study. (Bayne, 2000) Kant criticizes the utilitarian view that happiness is the highest goal.He opposes this view as it created loopholes where people would be used simply as factor to carry through or attain happiness. This would be disrespecting the fact that all human beings are rational and can choose or plan and anticipate their future. Kant portrays the unconditioned imperative approach where he sees all human beings as occupants of a special place in creation. battalion hire different ask which ought to be satisfied using certain means. He uses the term precept to refer to intentions or principle of action. human beings beings should not act in a way that portrays other people simply as means to an end but as an end to itself.In working to attain the maxim people should not use others simply as means to an end. People used should benefit from the arrangement and their consent should be sought. To him, duties should be beneficial to people used in the process of attaining the goals. I agree with Kants theory as all people should be treated with equivalence and with respect. There are two types of imperatives. The hypothetical imperative tells of what we ought to do to obtain a goal. The categorical imperative leads to absoluteness since human beings are rationa l and can govern their actions. People should only act on maxims that can arrive universal law.To Kant, there are universal moral laws that are logically necessary. Peoples actions should therefore be performed according to the delicious universal laws of morality. Individuals should act according to the same general, future and moral laws. (Robert, 2000). alone people should be treated with moral respect. Deception should not be considered even when being applied for wrongdoers. To Kant, duties can be perfect or imperfect. Imperfect duties entail working to develop our talents since they are given to us for a purpose while perfect duties entail a tariff to others.Kant rejected the ethical force brought about by tradition and coined the forward-looking idea of autonomy. He brought about the idea of centrality of rational thought. Each person can make free and autonomous choices and they are compelled by tenableness and the categorical imperative in their decisions. Adherence to categorical imperative provides for autonomous ethical choice since people make their decisions rationally. In pursuit for respective(a) maxims all parties involved benefit from the arrangement. Autonomous means self legislating.Autonomy of the get out is the ability of the will to be a will in itself while the will refers to the means by which a maxim can become a universal law. Heteronomy means the capacity to follow law other than itself to produce a universal law of morality. (Collins, 2000) To Kant, objects do not have value but man gives them value through their rational goals and desires. Human beings have an intrinsic worth or dignity. They should therefore act in good will out of a sense of duty and use the categorical imperative. What we give to society comes back to us and we ought not to deterioration others but work in ensuring that they benefit from out actions.