Religious Right in US Politics

Religious regenerate in US PoliticsExamine and assess the policy-making impact of the phantasmal function on US politics under the presidencies of George W. shrub.The political impact of the unearthly safe streetim the George W. furnish presidential term was causationful and multi faceted. This analyze pull up stakes out bill the spectral milieu from which George W. bush emerged, as well as assess those who rein lastingnessd and strengthened spiritual perspectives and determines in spite of appearance the Executive throughout this period. In addition to this specific assessment, this essay will examine the extraordinary influence religion had in Bushs campaign. It will advocate that the Bush boldness used political techniques in order to pass largely religious programs without the controversial labels, thus minimizing op plaza.After having lived a feel marked by substance abuse George W. Bush deliberates he had a deep religious conversion. As a result, he woul d refer to deity in unexclusive point of referencees, and unbuttonedly resignd a outlet of time that he sought guidance from god during his presidency. With solid groundments like these, it is inaccurate to state that George W. Bush and his administration were a finish uply unconsecrated soundbox. Furthermore, we must(prenominal) address the fact that his major appointees were besides highly religious. This specifically relates to a number of key positions held by men such as Dick Cheney fault President, Michael Gerson, appointed Chief Speech Writer, John Ashcroft, Attorney General, and Jerry Boykin appointed alternate Under Secretary of Defence for Intelligence. All of these mathematical functions are profoundly powerful and were all given to revivalists.1The rhetoric of George W. Bush and his administration was undeniably conscientiously influenced. The notion that the State and the Church is entirely separate was not usher in in this presidency. However, due to ambiguity, political jargon, exaggeration, and a plethora of other political techniques, the true religious foundations, that inspired, finales, discourse, policies and platforms, were somewhat avoided and concealed. An example of this is George W. Bushs comments in relation to Gay Marriage. Unlike the Evangelicals who simply state that they oppose it on the grounds that it was against Gods Will,2 the President stated that he debate it because marriage is an institution so fundamental to society that it should not be changed.3 This example outlines that the President, although foreign the view, did not clearly refer to any religious standings. However, due to the fact that he was openly religious, it is almost impossible to believe whether the view he publically offers, is not at all swayed by religious reasoning and rationale. The Bush giving medication was fundamentally religious. It was found on these garnish of principles, and as a result, were largely supported by those w ho share the said(prenominal) belief. This claims do not stand alone, over the years thither has been a very large number of critics, all of which hold the same view that the Bush Administration was led by a tree trunk who rejects the separation of church and state. Labelled a messianic militarist,4 George W. Bush, and the religious well(p) brought forward many assurance based policies, which had considerable effects on the Ameri potbelly population.The religious right of the Bush Administration is considered to reach changed or attempted to change many aspects of the Statesn life. This neo-conservative, ultra religious body inside the Bush executive hold a specific set of principles and beliefs, all of which considerably blur the lines of separation betwixt Church and State. A significant and highly controversial example of this is the concerted efforts to teach creationism or its more presentable replacement Intelligent Design in public schools.5 However, the examples dont in effect(p) relate to education, there are a number of aspects whereby the religious Right of the Bush Administration promote their Evangelist perspectives. Probably the most controversial, was the realizeic of spontaneous abortion, to which President Bush, wholeheartedly opposed. 6The religious undertones of the Bush Administration were forefront and obvious. Members of the cabinet spoke of overturning the Supreme Court decision in Roe V Wade which made abortion sub judice in 1973.7 This just highlightings that not only was the Bush Administration open in presenting their controversial, and highly religious perspectives, but that they significantly contradicted the very foundations upon which the American model of commonwealth was based. The American Government as a res publica, prides itself on the notion of equality, freedom and accountability. If a Government acts solely on a religious, somewhat personal agenda and thus unable to remain impartial, how can they regard the mselves as a democracy? The fact is, the Bush Administration did cross the line between Church and State, and the religious Right in spite of appearance the Administration was almost entirely responsible.In order to truly highlight the perspective of the religious Right, and thus outline the political impact they had during this period, the perspectives that surfaced put forward 9/11, when the so called War on Terror was in amply motion, must be analysed. The American religious Right, were anti-Islam. They voiced this openly and proudly. These opinions whether legitimate or not were present throughout the entire executive. They believed that Christ is the retort to evil in all societies,8 and therefore, when this war on terror was declared, they viewed their play off as one based upon spiritual foundations. On these grounds, the Christian Right approved of torture, and grave violations of human rights. Men of great power in the American governmental sphere, such as General Jerry Boykin, justified anti-Islamic thoughts and actions. He along with many other Evangelists and Neo-Conservatives held the belief that George W. Bush was put in the White House by God for the sole purpose of arriver victory in a battle against idolatrous Muslims.9 These opinions were supported by millions of American evangelicals, thus highlighting the impact the Christian Right had within this period of time. Their views, no matter how controversial, were always supported by a large number of American citizens, thus allowing the Bush Administration to dwell to act in an anti-secularist manner.The next aspect of the Bush Administration that must be examined is what is referred to as the Faith Based Initiative. This initiative aimed at braggart(a) public funds to religious institutions to provide social services. The Bush Administration placed this Faith Based Initiative as a top priority of domestic policy. However, even prior to taking office, as the regulator of Texas, Bush promoted this notion. It was later created through a series of executive orders, and under the name of Faith Based and Community Initiatives, so named because the state cant legally discriminate between secular and religious charities.10 The Faith Based Initiative reinforces this papers contention, that the Bush Administration acted anti-secularist, and based decisions and policy platforms upon religious foundations. The Bush Administration can be considered to have acted unconstitutionally, as the Faith Based Initiative somewhat infringes on the offset printing Amendment, that is The Establishment Clause which states government shall make no law respecting an make-up of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.11 Essentially, no American should be compelled through taxation to subsidize any religion. By blurring the lines of separation between Church and State, the government is not allowing Americans the right to make their own decisions in relation to religion and m atters of faith.In order to examine and assess the influence the Religious right had within the Bush disposal, we must look at the influences within the administration, and the viewpoint of the religious right in the time of campaigning. constantly since the early days of his campaign, when he declared in the primaries that his favourite philosopher was deliverer Christ,12 his support was high amongst the Evangelical Christians. He was considered by this large constituency to be on a divine plan,13 and is branded by many, including journalists, supporters and even non-supporters, as the leader of the Religious Right. In order to fully illustrate the front man of faith within this election campaign the group, formed by Televangelist cunning Robertson, known as the Christian conglutination must be discussed. frontly, in 2000, Bushs campaign was publicly endorsed by Robertson and his Christian Coalition. This was a largely influential group that this essay contends, was a driving force that lead to Bush being inaugurated. The Christian Coalition openly opposed John McCain, stating that they would go to all measures to prevent him from becoming the republican ships company nominee. In fact, Robertson stated on record that if he John McCain became the nominee of the Republican Party, the Christian Coalition, which is a voluntary organization, would not put out 75 million voter guides and would not urge its membership to vote for anybody in the general election. This highlights the power of this Christian Coalition at that time, and the power Robertson possessed. It in like manner illustrates that Bushs campaign was heavily influenced by the Religious right. In fact, his campaign advisor, Ralph Reed, was the Executive Director of the Christian Coalition. These claims of religious connotations and underlying notions of faith not only confirm the religious sway of this administration, but the complete lack of secularity within this time in American political h istory. condescension the United States being based on foundations of freedom, there was obviously a contradiction in terms and an infringement on these rights.The scope and impact this Christian Coalition had within the United States was extraordinary. Robertson and his Christian Coalition used a word form of methods to deliver their message. He voiced his opinions on his national TV program to influence voters, issued out flyers and publicly spoke about Bushs views on topics such as Abortion, Gay Marriage and condom distribution. The power and influence the Conservative Christians had in this election was colossal, although four million religious conservatives did not vote, there was still fifteen million religious conservatives who did. This just reinforces the fact that the religious aspect played a major role in the 2000 election. However, the methods employed to garner votes was where the true influence was shown. Their strategies were incredibly sophisticated. kind of tha n creating a completely Right wing perspective of Bush, which would only attract to those following the Christian Coalition, Robertson urged his supporters not to force Bush too far to the right as this would not appeal to a larger absolute majority of American Citizens. He knew that once he was elected, Bushs platform would be completely in line with his own perspectives, and as this essay will continue demonstrate, ultimately he was correct.The policy direction of the Bush Presidency was largely influenced by the Christian right. Behind a series of platforms was underlying tones of Religious extremism, and Conservative Christianity. An example of this is the enforcement of the Global Gag convening, also referred to as the Mexico City Policy. This policy places heavy constraints on foreign nongovernmental organizations that fulfil U.S. family planning funds. The constraints and restrictions included those F.N.G.Os that provided legal abortion services, lobbied their own governm ents for abortion law reform, or even provide accurate medical focus or referrals regarding abortion.14 This policy, which was reimposed on January 22, 2001, which was Bushs first business day in office and ironically the 28th Anniversary of Roe V Wade the landmark U.S Supreme Court Abortion Case, is entirely influenced by the Religious Right. It is fundamentalist in all aspects, and an illustrious example, of how influential this religious presence was within the Bush Administration.The influence the religious Right had within U.S politics under the George W. Bush Presidency was profound. As this essay has illustrated, the presence of this religious body was evident in all stages of the Bush Presidency. They were a driving force in the campaign stages, securing George W. Bushs position as President, and were largely influential within the policy direction taken by this administration. On review, it is accurate to state that the U.S Government during the George W. Bush Presidency definitely did blur the lines between state and religion. There was a contradiction of constitutional rights, and an anti-secularist presence throughout the entire administration.ReferencesBarker, David C., Jon Hurwitz, and Traci L. Nelson. 2008. Of Crusades and Culture Wars Messianic Militarism and Political strife in the United States. Journal Of Politics 70, no. 2 307-322. business line Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed may 27, 2014).George, Susan. Hijacking America How the religious and secular Right changed what Americans think. Cambridge, UK Malden, MA Polity. 2008. Pg 28.Kaplan, Ester. With God on their side how Christian fundamentalists trampled science, policy, and democracy in George W. Bushs White House. New York New fight down Distributed by Norton. 2004. rapscallion 39.Kenneth D. Wald Allison Calhoun-Brown. Religion and Politics in the United States. Lanham, Md. Rowman Littlefield Publishers, 2007Priscilla Smith, Kathy dormitory room Martinez and Tzili Mor . The Global Gag Rule A Violation of the Right to deliver Speech and Democratic Participation. humans Rights, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Summer 2002), pp. 12.Ribuffo, Leo P. George W. Bush, the faith-based presidency, and the latest evangelical menace. Journal of American and Canadian Studies 24 (2006) 17+. schoolman OneFile. Web. 27 May 2014. Page 17The Economist. A hot line to heaven George Bush and God. 18 Dec. 2004 39(US). pedantic OneFile. Web. 26 May 2014The personality of the United States, Amendments, Amendment 1, The Establishment Clause.Julian E. Zelizer, The Presidency of George W. Bush A First Historical Assessment. Princeton University weightlift (September 13, 2010) Page 229Bush has new role de facto leader of the religious right. (People Events). Church State 55.2 (2002) 15. expand Academic ASAP. Web. 26 May 2014.1 Ribuffo, Leo P. George W. Bush, the faith-based presidency, and the latest evangelical menace. Journal of American and Canadian Studies 24 (2006) 17+. Academ ic OneFile. Web. 27 May 2014. Page 172 A hot line to heaven George Bush and God. The Economist 18 Dec. 2004 39(US). Academic OneFile. Web. 26 May 2014.3 Ibid.4 Barker, David C., Jon Hurwitz, and Traci L. Nelson. 2008. Of Crusades and Culture Wars Messianic Militarism and Political Conflict in the United States. Journal Of Politics 70, no. 2 307-322. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed May 27, 2014).5 George, Susan. Hijacking America How the religious and secular Right changed what Americans think. Cambridge, UK Malden, MA Polity. 2008. Pg 28.6 Kenneth D. Wald Allison Calhoun-Brown. Religion and Politics in the United States. Lanham, Md. Rowman Littlefield Publishers, 20077 George, Susan. Hijacking America How the religious and secular Right changed what Americans think. Page 588 Ibid. Page 1349 Ibid. Page 13610 Ester Kaplan. With God on their side how Christian fundamentalists trampled science, policy, and democracy in George W. Bushs White House. New York New Press Di stributed by Norton. 2004. Page 39.11 The Constitution of the United States, Amendments, Amendment 1, The Establishment Clause.12 Julian E. Zelizer, The Presidency of George W. Bush A First Historical Assessment. Princeton University Press (September 13, 2010) Page 22913 Bush has new role de facto leader of the religious right. (People Events). Church State 55.2 (2002) 15. Expanded Academic ASAP. Web. 26 May 2014.14 Priscilla Smith, Kathy Hall Martinez and Tzili Mor. The Global Gag Rule A Violation of the Right to Free Speech and Democratic Participation. Human Rights, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Summer 2002), pp. 12.